Principles, Practices, Outcomes and Satisfaction
Fidelity
to the principles and practices of the Fairweather Lodge is
important for a number of reasons. But participant outcomes and
participant satisfaction are a test of fidelity at least as
important to the spirit of the Fairweather Model as any checklist of
programmatic elements. A comprehensive assessment of Lodge success,
therefore, involves: 1) Adherence to the Lodge Principles; 2)
Implementation of Lodge Practices; 3) Demonstrated Outcomes; and 4)
Participant Satisfaction (see page 6).
Principles
In his
ground-breaking 1963 book, Community Life for the Mentally Ill,
Dr. Fairweather established thirteen principles for successfully
integrating people with mental illness into the community. Although
all thirteen were valid at the time, the eight principles updated
for this assessment tool are those which remain relevant to
distinguishing the unique values of a Fairweather Lodge. A program
which is at odds with these principles might be a wonderful program,
but it is not a Fairweather Lodge.
Practices
Over the last forty
years, as practitioners have experimented with the Lodge Model, a
wide variety of practices have been implemented with various degrees
of success. The sixteen practices selected for this assessment are
those which have enjoyed the greatest success. We recognize that
conditions vary from one setting to the next, and that the most
successful practitioners are those who can adapt to local
conditions, but these sixteen practices are highly recommended,
especially for new programs.
Outcomes
We presume that
anyone associated with a Fairweather Lodge will have a philosophical
affinity for the values defined by the eight Principles and sixteen
Practices. And it is easy to get engrossed in implementing the
principles and practices while at the same time struggling to
obtain/maintain funding, hire/supervise staff, recruit/ screen
participants. But hopefully, the reason practitioners choose the
Lodge Model in the first place is because of the potential outcomes,
and any assessment of Lodge success needs to examine the outcomes
produced.
Housing, Employment, Social and Autonomy
Although a
Fairweather Lodge is understood to be a package of highly-integrated
services, we have broken the assessment into four domains for the
purpose of evaluation. Surveys of the needs/wants/desires of people
with serious mental illness provide three obvious domains --
housing, employment, and a social life. To this we add the uniquely
Fairweather perspective of group autonomy. A successful Fairweather
Lodge should score well across all four domains.
Housing
Principle I.
The lodge must provide a safe,
healthy and caring environment, which reinforces the recovery
process.
Practice A.
Lodges should be located in a safe and accepting neighborhood.
Practice B..
Lodges should be attentive to exercise and nutrition.
Practice C..
Lodges should control the use of alcohol and street drugs
Proposed
Outcome Measures:
Number of undesirable
interactions (e.g., getting mugged, name-calling) in the
neighborhood per participant-year, (or versus desirable
interactions.)
Percentage of
participants eating healthy.
Percentage of
participants exercising regularly.
Percentage of
participants using drugs or alcohol.
OR
4.a Undesirable
incidents related to drugs or alcohol.
Principle II.
The Lodge must be part of the
plan for managing symptoms and promoting good mental health.
Practice D.
Good quality psychiatric care (implying a doctor-patient
partnership) should be available.
Proposed
Outcome Measure #5:
Average length of
wait for non-routine psych visit.
Practice E.
Lodges should have a standard mechanism for ensuring medication
compliance (This mechanism should be adjustable in response to
variance in earned autonomy.)
Proposed
Outcome Measure #6:
Percentage of
medications taken as prescribed.
Principle III.
Services must be available as long
as the participant wants and needs them.
Practice F.
(Except as established by the Lodge) There should not be any
minimum or maximum time limits on participation.
Principle IV.
People with psychiatric
disabilities increase their community success and raise their social
status through employment, through accumulating wealth, and through
direct (not third-party) consumerism.
Practice G.
Everyone of working age should be employed (except in the event
of temporary incapacity) and employment should begin immediately
upon entry into the lodge.
Proposed
Outcome Measure #7:
Average weekly wages
per participant.
Practice H.
Employment (and costs related to participation in the Lodge) should
be structured so as to ensure financial reward for increasing
participation in employment.
Proposed
Outcome Measure #8:
Percentage of
participants earning more than the cost of their room and board.
Practice I.
Employment may be offered in the form of a (affirmative) business
operated by the lodge. If employment through an affirmative business
is provided:
1. Work opportunities
should include a range of tasks from simple to complex, with
appropriate accommodations for the illness;
2. Participants
should be paid commensurate with their contribution to the business;
3. There should be
frequent and realistic evaluation of performance and an opportunity
to advance; and
4. Participants
should have a choice between working in the affirmative
business and outside employment, especially if the
affirmative business does not provide opportunities commensurate
with the participant’s skills and experience (but not working
should not an option, and neither should prolonged job-search).
Social
Principle V.
Above and beyond economic
roles, participants need to perceive (and to have) meaningful social
roles in both the Lodge and the larger community.
Practice J:
Every participant should contribute to
the collective good to the limit of his/her ability. (Equity of
contribution and autonomy from one participant to the next is of
secondary importance).
Proposed
Outcome Measure #9:
Social
adjustment/level of functioning .
Principle VI.
Successful Lodges resemble a
healthy family.
Practice K.
Participants should share at least one meal a day.
Practice L.
Participants should share at least one social/recreational event a
week.
Proposed
Outcome Measures 10 & 11:
Number of meals per
week shared by at least 75% of members.
Number of
social/recreational event per month shared by at least 75% of
members
Autonomy
Principle VII.
In order to progress, people with psychiatric disabilities need
autonomy commensurate with their behavioral performance, with the
ultimate goal of full autonomy. Similarly, the Lodge needs autonomy
commensurate with its behavioral performance, with total autonomy
being the ultimate goal. (Peer support is ultimately more
powerful than assistance from paid service providers.)
Practice M.
The lodge participants, through some form of collective
decision-making, should be responsible (to the extent that the
skills are present) for all aspects of Lodge management including
but not limited to finance, maintenance, meal planning and
preparation, social life, transportation, rules related to
interaction between members and symptom management including the
taking of medications. Professionals serve as advisors to the
Lodge, never managers.
Proposed
Outcome Measure #12:
Average # of
hours/week paid service providers are present in the Lodge.
Practice N.
If the skills required for certain tasks are not available within
the membership, the advisors should provide these skills
temporarily. Training should be provided so as to help one or more
participants to acquire these skills and advance individual and
group autonomy.
Practice O.
Lodges typically need assistance and feedback on how they are doing;
this need should decrease over time, but may never disappear. It is
advisable, especially during the training phase, to have a special
communication system which facilitates this assistance and feedback
while simultaneously promoting autonomous group decision-making.
Principle VIII.
Lodges must not be dependent on
resources from any single entity.
Practice P:
Lodges and Lodge Programs
require strong leadership, committed to all 8 principles and
focused on long-term success.
Proposed
Outcome Measures 13 & 14:
Number of “engaged”
community partners providing on-going resources.
Largest single source
of revenue as a percentage of total revenue.
Implementation of
Lodge Practices
|
Housing: |
Yes |
No |
|
The Lodge has
a plan for controlling the use of alcohol and street drugs. |
|
|
|
Participation
in the Lodge guarantees good quality psychiatric care,
available in a timely manner. |
|
|
|
The Lodge has
a standard mechanism (adjustable in response to earned
autonomy) for ensuring medication compliance.
|
|
|
|
There are
minimum or maximum time limits on participation in the
Lodge. |
|
|
|
Employment |
Yes |
No |
|
All
participants are employed at least 15 hours per week. |
|
|
|
Employment
begins immediately upon entry into the lodge. |
|
|
|
The more
participants work, the more disposable income they ha ve. |
|
|
|
If
employment through an affirmative business is provided: |
X |
X |
|
1. Work
opportunities include a range of tasks from simple to
complex, with appropriate accommodations for the illness. |
|
|
|
2.
Participants are be paid commensurate with their
contribution to the business. |
|
|
|
3. There are
frequent and realistic evaluation of performance and an
opportunity to advance. |
|
|
|
4.
Participants should have a choice between working in the
affirmative business and outside employment. |
|
|
|
Social |
Yes |
No |
|
Every
participant contributes to the collective good of the lodge. |
|
|
|
Equity of
contribution from one participant to the next is of
secondary importance. |
|
|
|
The Lodge (or
the members) contribute to society. |
|
|
|
Autonomy |
Yes |
No |
|
Lodge
participants, as a group, make decisions about: |
X |
X |
|
Finances |
|
|
|
Home
maintenance |
|
|
|
Meal planning
and preparation |
|
|
|
Social life |
|
|
|
Transportation |
|
|
|
Rules related
to interaction between members |
|
|
|
Symptom
management, including the taking of medications |
|
|
|
Training is
available to develop individual and group skill related to: |
X |
X |
|
Finances |
|
|
|
Home
maintenance |
|
|
|
Meal planning
and preparation |
|
|
|
Social life |
|
|
|
Transportation |
|
|
|
Rules related
to interaction between members |
|
|
|
Symptom
management, including the taking of medications |
|
|
|
A special
communication system is used during training. |
|
|
|
This system
provides feedback to individuals and group at least once per
week. |
|
|
|
This system
promotes autonomous group decision-making. |
|
|
|
Fidelity to
Autonomy Principles |
Yes |
No |
|
1. Both the
Lodge and the Sponsoring Agency endorse full autonomy as the
ultimate
goal. |
|
|
|
2. A system
is in place which adjusts autonomy commensurate with Lodge performance. |
|
|
|
3. The Lodge
is dependent on resources from a single source. |
|
|
|
a. If
yes, a plan exists to diversify. |
|
|
Satisfaction
Although choices are
often limited by an under-developed community mental health system,
the Fairweather philosophy is based on the assumption that Lodge
members participate voluntarily. One of the implications of
voluntary participation is that adherence to the principles,
implementation of the practices, and even the production of
desirable outcomes, are meaningless unless the participants are
satisfied that their basic needs are being met.
Most surveys of the
needs/wants/desires of people with serious mental illness produce
the same general results with respect to the BIG 3 (not always in
the same order): a “nice place to live,” a “good job, ” and
friends. It is a given that a Lodge provides housing, but is it a
“nice place to live?” Does the employment provided meet the
standard of a “good job?” Are the other participants really
“friends?” And does allegiance to the autonomy principles and a low
staffing ratio actually produce empowerment? The most direct way to
answer these questions is to ask the participants.
However, one
limitation of satisfaction surveys is that some people always
express satisfaction, even while planning to leave the program, and
others will complain bitterly for years but never contemplate
leaving. (This phenomenon is not exclusive to mental illness.) It
is important, therefore, to measure retention -- a less direct, but
potentially more telling strategy for measuring satisfaction. So we
add:
Proposed Outcome
Measure #15:
The percentage of
participants, at a given starting point, still participating at a
certain benchmark.
Public Interest
The taxpaying public
has a legitimate interest in the cost-effectiveness of any program
supported with public funds. So even though it is an imperfect
measure of Lodge success, and not necessarily tied to the Lodge
mission, we add:
Proposed Outcome
Measure #16:
Number of days of
in-patient psych hospitalization as percentage of participant-days.
Lodge Member
Satisfaction Survey
|
Housing
|
Yes |
No |
|
1. My lodge
is in good repair. |
|
|
|
2. I feel
safe in my lodge. |
|
|
|
3. I feel
healthier than before I joined the Lodge. |
|
|
|
4. The meds I
take help me maintain my mental health. |
|
|
|
5. The use of
alcohol and /or street drugs is causing trouble in my lodge. |
|
|
|
Employment |
Yes |
No |
|
6. I like my
job. |
|
|
|
7. I have
more spending money than before I came to the lodge. |
|
|
|
8. I think
more about work than about having mental illness. |
|
|
|
Social
|
Yes |
No |
|
9. I enjoy
group meals. |
|
|
|
10. I enjoy
group social/recreational events. |
|
|
|
11. I have
at least one good friend in the lodge. |
|
|
|
Autonomy
|
Yes |
No |
|
12. I am
increasingly responsible for my own future. |
|
|
|
13. I have a
voice in the decisions my lodge makes. |
|
|
|
14. My
lodge-mates and I are increasingly responsible for the
future of our lodge. |
|
|